Cardiovascular disease risk scores in patients with optimal vs suboptimal weight loss after bariatric surgery: Translating improvements into clinical practice.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk modification in patients with optimal weight loss (OWL) versus suboptimal weight loss SWL following MBS. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis. The 10-year risk CVD was estimated before and after one year of surgery using the "Framingham Score". RESULTS: 191 patients were included in our study. Mean baseline Framingham score was 7.2 â€‹± â€‹6.9%. According to the score, 54% of patients were classified as low risk (n â€‹= â€‹104), 23% as moderate (n â€‹= â€‹43), 20% moderately high (n â€‹= â€‹39) and 3% as high risk (n â€‹= â€‹5). One year after surgery, 91% of the patients showed reduction of their Framingham score. Mean CVD risk score decreased significantly to 4.1 â€‹± â€‹3.7% when compared to baseline (p-value is â€‹< â€‹0.001); 80% of patients classified as low risk (n â€‹= â€‹153), 13% as moderate (n â€‹= â€‹25), 7% moderately high (n â€‹= â€‹13) and 0% as high risk (n â€‹= â€‹0). CONCLUSION: Weight loss after bariatric surgery reduces CVD risk scores and the magnitude of effect correlates with the degree of weight loss.

Effectiveness and safety of the combination of sodium-glucose transport protein 2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials and real-world studies suggest that combination therapy with sodium-glucose transport protein 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) is associated with improvement in fasting plasma glucose (FPG), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), systolic blood pressure (SBP), body mass index (BMI), and total cholesterol levels. However, a systematic review of available real-world evidence may facilitate clinical decision-making in the real-world scenario. This meta-analysis assessed the safety and effectiveness of combinations of SGLT2is + GLP-1RAs with a focus on their cardioprotective effects along with glucose-lowering ability in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in a real-world setting. METHODS: Electronic searches were performed in the PubMed/MEDLINE, PROQuest, Scopus, CINAHL, and Google Scholar databases. Qualitative analyses and meta-analyses were performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute SUMARI software package and Review Manager v5.4, respectively. RESULTS: The initial database search yielded 1445 articles; of these, 13 were included in this study. The analyses indicated that SGLT2is + GLP-1RAs combinations were associated with significantly lower all-cause mortality when compared with individual therapies (odds ratio [95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49 [0.41, 0.60]; p < 0.00001). Significant reductions in BMI (- 1.71 [- 2.74, - 0.67]; p = 0.001), SBP (- 6.35 [- 10.17, - 2.53]; p = 0.001), HbA1c levels (- 1.48 [- 1.75, - 1.21]; p < 0.00001), and FPG (- 2.27 [- 2.78, - 1.76]; p < 0.00001) were associated with the simultaneous administration of the combination. Changes in total cholesterol levels and differences between simultaneous and sequential combination therapies for this outcome were not significant. CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis based on real-world data suggests that the combination of SGLT2is + GLP-1RAs is associated with lower all-cause mortality and favorable improvements in cardiovascular, renal, and glycemic measurements. The findings drive a call-to-action to incorporate this combination early and simultaneously in managing T2DM patients and achieve potential cardiovascular benefits and renal protection.

Comparison of Contemporary Risk Scores in All Groups of Pulmonary Hypertension: A Pulmonary Vascular Research Institute GoDeep Meta-Registry Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a heterogeneous disease with a poor prognosis. Accurate risk stratification is essential for guiding treatment decisions in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Although various risk models have been developed for PAH, their comparative prognostic potential requires further exploration. Additionally, the applicability of risk scores in PH groups beyond group 1 remains to be investigated. RESEARCH QUESTION: Are risk scores originally developed for PAH predictive in PH groups 1 through 4? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive analysis of outcomes among patients with incident PH enrolled in the multicenter worldwide Pulmonary Vascular Research Institute GoDeep meta-registry. Analyses were performed across PH groups 1 through 4 and further subgroups to evaluate the predictive value of PAH risk scores, including REVEAL Lite 2, REVEAL 2.0, ESC/ERS 2022, COMPERA 3-strata, and COMPERA 4-strata. RESULTS: Eight thousand five hundred sixty-five patients were included in the study, of whom 3,537 patients were assigned to group 1 PH, whereas 1,807 patients, 1,635 patients, and 1,586 patients were assigned to group 2 PH, group 3 PH, and group 4 PH, respectively. Pulmonary hemodynamics were impaired with median mean pulmonary arterial pressure of 42 mm Hg (33-52 mm Hg) and pulmonary vascular resistance of 7 WU (4-11 WU). All risk scores were prognostic in the entire PH population and in each of the PH groups 1 through 4. The REVEAL scores, when used as continuous prediction models, demonstrated the highest statistical prognostic power and granularity; the COMPERA 4-strata risk score provided subdifferentiation of the intermediate-risk group. Similar results were obtained when separately analyzing various subgroups (PH subgroups 1.1, 1.4.1, and 1.4.4; PH subgroups 3.1 and 3.2; group 2 with isolated postcapillary PH vs combined precapillary and postcapillary PH; patients of all groups with concomitant cardiac comorbidities; and severe [> 5 WU] vs nonsevere PH). INTERPRETATION: This comprehensive study with real-world data from 15 PH centers showed that PAH-designed risk scores possess predictive power in a large PH cohort, whether considered as common to the group or calculated separately for each PH group (1-4) and various subgroups.

A Practical Approach to the Management of Residual Cardiovascular Risk: United Arab Emirates Expert Consensus Panel on the Evidence for Icosapent Ethyl and Omega-3 Fatty Acids.

PURPOSE: Patients with hyperlipidemia treated with statins remain at a residual cardiovascular (CV) risk. Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids hold the potential to mitigate the residual CV risk in statin-treated patients, with persistently elevated triglyceride (TG) levels. METHOD: We reviewed the current evidence on the use of icosapent ethyl (IPE), an omega-3 fatty acid yielding a pure form of eicosapentaenoic acid. RESULTS: REDUCE-IT reported a significant 25% reduction in CV events, including the need for coronary revascularization, the risk of fatal/nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina, and CV death in patients on IPE, unseen with other omega-3 fatty acids treatments. IPE was effective in all patients regardless of baseline CV risk enhancers (TG levels, type-2 diabetes status, weight status, prior revascularization, or renal function). Adverse events (atrial fibrillation/flutter) related to IPE have occurred mostly in patients with prior atrial fibrillation. Yet, the net clinical benefit largely exceeded potential risks. The combination with other omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, in particular DHA, eliminated the effect of EPA alone, as reported in the STRENGTH and OMEMI trials. Adding IPE to statin treatment seems to be cost-effective, especially in the context of secondary prevention of CVD, decreasing CV event frequency and subsequently the use of healthcare resources. CONCLUSION: Importantly, IPE has been endorsed by 20 international medical societies as a statin add-on treatment in patients with dyslipidemia and high CV risk. Robust medical evidence supports IPE as a pillar in the management of dyslipidemia.

First Report of Inclisiran Utilization for Hypercholesterolemia Treatment in Real-world Clinical Settings in a Middle East Population.

PURPOSE: Inclisiran is the first small interfering RNA-based treatment approved for reducing pro-atherogenic lipoproteins in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia or clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, who require additional lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). We report the first evaluation of the effects of inclisiran in a Middle East population. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients initiating inclisiran treatment at an outpatient diabetology, endocrinology, and cardiology center between May 2021 and December 2022. All patients followed up for 90 days or more, or with at least 1 lipid determination post initiation were included. Participants were categorized into primary prevention (n = 57) and secondary prevention (n = 89) groups according to previous atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. FINDINGS: Inclisiran was initiated in 146 patients; mean (SD) age was 54.8 (12.12) years, 82 patients (56.2%) were male, 28 patients (19.2%) had received a diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia, 89 patients (61%) had received a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, and 35 patients (23.9%) had a statin intolerance. Median (interquartile range) follow-up was 137 (90 to 193) days. At 90 days, median (interquartile range) reductions in serum LDL-C and triglycerides were -37.9% (-9.5% to -51.2%) and -12.0% (-9.8% to -40.5%), respectively, in primary prevention and -54.1% (-17.1% to -71.4%) and -15.3% (-14% to -38.8%), respectively, in secondary prevention (all, P < 0.001). LDL-C goals were attained in 110 patients (75.3%). Nonattainment of LDL-C goal was attributed to system effect in 26 patients (72.2%), biological effect in 5 patients (13.9%), and discontinuation of treatment in 5 patients (13.9%). Therapy was well tolerated. IMPLICATIONS: This study is the first from the Middle East and North Africa region that reported the real-world efficacy and safety profile of inclisiran in a mixed-risk population of patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and other non-familial hypercholesterolemia indications. Clinically meaningful and sustained reductions in pro-atherogenic lipids with good tolerability were observed after inclisiran initiation. Fewer AEs were reported in this predominantly Arabic population, consistent with previous safety reports for inclisiran. It is important to note that no patient stopped inclisiran treatment due to AEs. Strengths of our study included an optimal cohort, patient heterogeneity, and high retention. In addition, we were able to report mean robust effects of inclisiran and good medication tolerability, quite like randomized studies and open-label extension periods. Despite this, our study had some limitations, including selection bias due to the retrospective design and the absence of a comparative group.

Flash'O real-world evidence programme - Attitude and practices toward the use of omega-3 FA by physicians from Middle East Countries.

The Flash'O project was designed to provide insights into the current use of prescription omega-3 and their perceived benefits by physicians in real-world clinical practice, in Russia, Saudi Arabia, Thailand, and Gulf countries, and to determine the adherence of physicians to dyslipidemia management guidelines. The present study focuses on Flash'O's process and results in Middle East countries. A total of 338 physicians and specialists completed the online questionnaire. Most responding physicians were male (91.7%), general practitioners (42.6%) with more than 5 years of seniority (80.4%) and saw more than 50 patients a week (71.5%). Most surveyed physicians (64.2%) reported using guidelines in their daily practice for the management of their patients with dyslipidemia. They mostly followed national guidelines (68.6%). American or European ones were less commonly used. Responding physicians thought that omega-3 supplementation could be more beneficial in all types of dyslipidemia, except high non- hight density lipoproteins, and for patients suffering from obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, acute coronary syndrome with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and high cardiovascular diseases risk (score ≥ 5% and < 10%), but less beneficial in chronic kidney disease. Respondents recommended omega-3 to their patients mainly after statin treatment in patients with dyslipidemia and for the treatment of dyslipidemia. This survey confirmed that omega-3 fatty acids are at the heart of the cardiovascular medical strategy.

Regional expert opinion: Management of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in the Middle East, North Africa and Turkey.

Although epidemiological data on heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are scarce in the Middle East, North Africa and Turkey (MENAT) region, Lancet Global Burden of Disease estimated the prevalence of HF in the MENAT region in 2019 to be 0.78%, versus 0.71% globally. There is also a high incidence of HFpEF risk factors and co-morbidities in the region, including coronary artery disease, diabetes, obesity, hypertension, anaemia and chronic kidney disease. For instance, 14.5-16.2% of adults in the region reportedly have diabetes, versus 7.0% in Europe. Together with increasing life expectancy, this may contribute towards a higher burden of HFpEF in the region than currently reported. This paper aims to describe the epidemiology and burden of HFpEF in the MENAT region, including unique risk factors and co-morbidities. It highlights challenges with diagnosing HFpEF, such as the prioritization of HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), the specific profile of HFpEF patients in the region and barriers to effective management associated with the healthcare system. Guidance is given on the diagnosis, prevention and management of HFpEF, including the emerging role of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors. Given the high burden of HFpEF coupled with the fact that its prevalence is likely to be underestimated, healthcare professionals need to be alert to its signs and symptoms and to manage patients accordingly. Historically, HFpEF treatments have focused on managing co-morbidities and symptoms, but new agents are now available with proven effects on outcomes in patients with HFpEF.

Comprehensive description of the prevalence, serological and clinical characteristics, and visceral involvement of systemic sclerosis (scleroderma) in a large cohort from the United Arab Emirates Systemic Sclerosis Registry.

Systemic sclerosis is an autoimmune condition characterized by a wide range of clinical presentations. Registries may serve to expand understanding about systemic sclerosis and aid in patient care and follow-up. The objective of this study was to analyze the prevalence of systemic sclerosis in a large cohort from the United Arab Emirates Systemic Sclerosis Registry and find the significant similarities and differences between the different subsets. All scleroderma patients in the United Arab Emirates were included in this multicenter national retrospective analysis. Data on demographics, comorbidities, serological characteristics, clinical aspects, and treatment were collected and analyzed, highlighting the most common traits identified. A total of 167 systemic scleroderma patients from diverse ethnic backgrounds were enrolled. Overall, 54.5% (91/167) of the patients were diagnosed with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis, and 45.5% (76/167) with limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis. The prevalence of systemic sclerosis was 1.66 per 100,000 for the total registry and 7.78 per 100,000 for United Arab Emirates patients. Almost all patients in the diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis and limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis groups tested positive for the immunofluorescence antinuclear antibody. Antibodies against Scl-70 were significantly more associated with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis, whereas anticentromere antibodies were significantly more associated with the limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis group (p < 0.001). Sclerodactyly, shortness of breath, and digital ulcers were more common in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis patients compared with the limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis subtype in terms of clinical symptoms and organ involvement. Telangiectasia was much more common in the limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis group. Furthermore, diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis patients had more lung fibrosis (interstitial lung disease) than limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis patients (70.5% vs 45.7%), and pulmonary arterial hypertension was twice as common in limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis patients as it was in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis patients. Local registries are paramount to understanding the clinical/serological characteristics of scleroderma. This study emphasizes the importance of raising disease awareness and distinguishing between the various systemic sclerosis subsets to implement patient-tailored strategies for early detection, better management, and higher quality of care.

Management of Heart Failure in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus in the UAE: A Call to Action.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is an important adverse outcome of diabetes mellitus (DM) with high rates of mortality and HF-related hospitalizations. The risk of HF is 2 times higher in patients with DM compared to those without DM. Due to under-recognition and underdiagnoses, HF is often a neglected outcome in the diabetic population. There is a dearth of data regarding the true prevalence of HF and the management protocols for diabetic patients at risk of HF in the UAE and the Middle East. This lacuna in the information has led to the inception of this "call to action" paper, which identifies the gaps in the true prevalence of HF and describes the importance of early diagnosis and appropriate management of HF in the Middle East. METHODOLOGY: An advisory board meeting was convened and a group of key opinion leaders and experts in cardiology and endocrinology assembled to describe the prevalence, diagnosis, and management of HF in diabetes patients and to present a "call to action" in the UAE and Middle East scenario. After the group discussion, key expert opinions were formulated and "call to action" recommendations were proposed. CONCLUSION: This "call to action" is mainly based on the available evidence from the literature and the experts' clinical experience. Based on the new evidence from various cardiovascular outcome trials, the "call to action" highlights a series of collaborative learning regarding the role of newer antidiabetic therapies like sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in the prevention and management of HF. This "call to action" intends to serve as a guide for physicians, including primary healthcare providers, in their management of diabetic patients with HF.

Attacking the Achilles heel of cardiac amyloid nuclear scintigraphy: How to reduce equivocal and false positive studies.

BACKGROUND: Planar and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) nuclear imaging techniques with bone seeking radiotracers have been increasingly adopted for diagnosis of ATTR cardiac amyloidosis. However, inherent limitations of these techniques due to lack of anatomical landmarks have been recognized, with consequent high numbers of equivocal or false positive cases. SPECT/computed tomography (CT) fusion imaging offers a significant advantage to overcome these limitations by substantially reducing inaccurate interpretations. The authors present the results of a 3-year imaging quality improvement project that focused on reducing the high number of equivocal studies that were noted in the first two years of the amyloidosis program, comparing SPECT only to SPECT/CT fusion technique. METHODS: A retrospective, systematic analysis of 176 patient records was performed to test the premise that SPECT/CT fusion imaging has the potential to reduce equivocal and false positive results. RESULTS: Of a total of 176 patients, 35 equivocal (19.8%), 32 (18.18%) strongly suggestive, and 109 (61.93%) not suggestive cases were identified. Recognizing that this was not consistent with the international data, the authors set out on a comprehensive quality assessment project to reduce the number of equivocal and false positive cases. In patients who initially underwent SPECT only (Group A; n = 78), the addition of SPECT/CT fusion resulted in the net reclassification of 73% of cases: 100% of equivocal cases (n = 35) were reclassified to not suggestive (n = 34) or strongly suggestive (n = 1). 73% of strongly suggestive cases (n = 30) were reclassified to not suggestive (n = 22) while 8 strongly suggestive cases were confirmed as true positives. 13 not suggestive cases remained negative after SPECT/CT fusion. In cases where SPECT/CT fusion was utilized from the beginning (Group B; n = 98), there were no reclassification of any of the cases when these cases were reprocessed as a control group. CONCLUSION: Addition of SPECT/CT imaging reduces the false positive or equivocal studies and increases the diagnostic accuracy of the test. All false positive and equivocal studies were eliminated using the fusion technique. Utilizing the fusion imaging technique increases the spatial resolution, with the ability to localize myocardial uptake and accurately differentiate from blood pool, which is a major source of error.

The First Pulmonary Hypertension Registry in the United Arab Emirates (UAEPH): Clinical Characteristics, Hemodynamic Parameters with Focus on Treatment and Outcomes for Patients with Group 1-PH.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to present the first United Arab Emirates pulmonary hypertension registry of patients' clinical characteristics, hemodynamic parameters and treatment outcomes. METHOD: This is a retrospective study describing all the adult patients who underwent a right heart catheterization for evaluation of pulmonary hypertension (PH) between January 2015 and December 2021 in a tertiary referral center in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. RESULTS: A total of 164 consecutive patients were diagnosed with PH during the five years of the study. Eighty-three patients (50.6%) were World Symposium PH Group 1-PH; nineteen patients (11.6%) were Group 2-PH due to left heart disease; twenty-three patients (14.0%) were Group 3-PH due to chronic lung disease; thirty-four patients (20.7%) were Group 4-PH due to chronic thromboembolic lung disease, and five patients (3.0%) were Group 5-PH. Among Group 1-PH, twenty-five (30%) had idiopathic, twenty-seven (33%) had connective tissue disease, twenty-six (31%) had congenital heart disease, and five patients (6%) had porto-pulmonary hypertension. The median follow-up was 55.6 months. Most of the patients were started on dual then sequentially escalated to triple combination therapy. The 1-, 3- and 5-year cumulative probabilities of survival for Group 1-PH were 86% (95% CI, 75-92%), 69% (95% CI, 54-80%) and 69% (95% CI, 54-80%). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first registry of Group 1-PH from a single tertiary referral center in the UAE. Our cohort was younger with a higher percentage of patients with congenital heart disease compared to cohorts from Western countries but similar to registries from other Asian countries. Mortality is comparable to other major registries. Adopting the new guideline recommendations and improving the availability and adherence to medications are likely to play a significant role in improving outcomes in the future.

A cross-sectional study of the prevalence and clinical management of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases in patients with type 2 diabetes across the Middle East and Africa (PACT-MEA): Study design and rationale.

AIM: To investigate the epidemiology and clinical management of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (eASCVD) or high/very high ASCVD risk, defined by the 2021 European Society of Cardiology Guidelines, in seven countries in the Middle East and Africa (PACT-MEA; NCT05317845), and to assess physicians' attitudes and the basis for their decision-making in the management of these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PACT-MEA is a cross-sectional, observational study undertaken in Bahrain, Egypt, Jordan, Kuwait, Qatar, South Africa and the United Arab Emirates based on a medical chart review of approximately 3700 patients with T2D in primary and secondary care settings, and a survey of approximately 400 physicians treating patients with T2D. RESULTS: The primary and secondary objectives are to determine the prevalence of eASCVD and high/very high ASCVD risk in patients with T2D. Current treatment with cardioprotective antidiabetic medication, the proportion of patients meeting the treatment criteria for reimbursement in the study countries where there is an applicable reimbursement guideline, and physician-reported factors in clinical decision-making in T2D management, will also be assessed. CONCLUSIONS: This large cross-sectional study will establish the estimated prevalence and management of eASCVD and high/very high ASCVD risk in patients with type 2 diabetes across the Middle East and Africa.

Prevalence of Cardiovascular Risk Factors and 10-Years Risk for Coronary Heart Disease in the United Arab Emirates.

BACKGROUND: In the United Arab Emirates (UAE), cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of mortality, and the incidence of premature coronary heart diseases (CHDs) is about 10-15 years earlier than that in people of western countries. AIM: The current cross-sectional study aims to describe the prevalence of CVD risk factors and estimate the 10-years risk for CHDs in the population of Abu Dhabi, UAE. OBJECTIVE: The main objective was to report the 10-years risk for CHD in a sample of the UAE population. METHODS: We have analyzed the dataset from the Abu Dhabi Screening Program for Cardiovascular Risk Markers (AD-SALAMA), a population-based cross-sectional survey conducted between 2009 and 2015 (a sample of 1002, 20 to 79 years old without CVDs or diabetes). RESULTS: 18.0% of our sample have had hypertension (HTN), 26.3% were current smokers, 33% have had total cholesterol ≥200 mg/dL, 55.0% have had non-high-density lipoprotein (non-HDL) levels ≥130 mg/dL, 33.1% have had low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels ≥130 mg/dL, calculated by ß-quantification as 112.3 ± 47.1 mg/dL. 66.8% were overweight or obese, and 46.2% had a sedentary lifestyle. Nearly 85% of our sample has had one or more major cardiovascular risk factors. The estimated 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease according to different risk assessment tools was as follows: 7.1% according to the national cholesterol education program Framingham risk score (FRAM-ATP), 2.9% according to Pooled Cohort Risk Assessment Equation (PCRAE) , 1.4% according to the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III), and 1.1% according to Reynolds Risk Score. Despite the fact that our sample population have had exhibited major risk factors, the above-mentioned international scoring systems underestimate the 10-year risk of cardiovascular diseases, given the high prevalence at younger ages. CONCLUSION: The proportion of modifiable risk factors has been found to be high in the UAE population, and the majority of them have had one or more risk factors with a higher 10-years risk for CHDs.

The First Report of a Real-world Experience With a PCSK9 Inhibitor in a Large Familial Hyperlipidemia and Very-high-risk Middle Eastern Population.

PURPOSE: Evolocumab, a monoclonal inhibitor of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9, has been shown to reduce proatherogenic lipoproteins in patients with or without familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), diabetes mellitus, or atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). We explored the safety profile and clinical effectiveness of evolocumab in an outpatient population of Emirati individuals with FH diagnosed per Dutch Lipid Clinic Network criteria, previous ASCVD, or statin intolerance. METHODS: This study was a retrospective review of patients initiating evolocumab treatment for any indication at Imperial College London Diabetes Centre between 2017 and 2020. All individuals followed up for at least 90 days or with at least one lipid panel postinitiation were included. Participants were subclassified into primary prevention (no previous ASCVD event, n = 81) and secondary prevention (any prior clinical ASCVD event, n = 102) groups. FINDINGS: Evolocumab was initiated in 183 individuals (mean [SD] age, 51.5 [12.4] years; 51% male); 108 (59%) had a clinical or genetic FH diagnosis, and 70.5% had diabetes mellitus. Statin intolerance was a treatment indication in 60 (32.8%) individuals. At 90 days, substantial reductions in serum LDL-C, triglycerides (TG), and total cholesterol:HDL-C (TC:HDL-C) were observed in both the primary and secondary prevention groups, and both FH and non-FH individuals. In the primary prevention group, median (interquartile range) reduction in LDL-C was 43.7% (10.8%; 63.0%); TG, 15.0% (7.2%; 35.3%); and TC:HDL-C, 31.5% (11.1%; 46.0%). In the secondary prevention group, median (interquartile range) reduction in LDL-C was 48.3% (22%; 70%); TG, 19.6% (1.2%; 32.5%); and TC:HDL-C, 32.6% (14.6%; 46.3%) (all, P < 0.0001). American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association LDL-C targets were consistently achieved in 114 (62.3%) patients during a follow-up of 359 (79-639) days. Nonattainment of the LDL-C target was attributed to nonadherence in 36 (52.2%) patients and discontinuation of treatment in 14 (20.3%) patients. Evolocumab was discontinued in 4 patients because of adverse events. IMPLICATIONS: This study is the first from the Middle East and North Africa region that reports the real-world efficacy of evolocumab in a mixed risk population of individuals with FH and other non-FH indications. Clinically meaningful and sustained reductions in LDL-C, TG, and cholesterol ratios were observed after evolocumab initiation. Few adverse events were reported in this predominantly Arabic population, consistent with previous safety reports for evolocumab. Notable strengths of this study include a relatively large cohort, patient heterogeneity and high retention, and a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Despite these strengths, the study has some limitations, including the selection bias due to the retrospective design and absence of comparative group.

Managing thrombotic risk in patients with diabetes.

It is well known that diabetes is a prominent risk factor for cardiovascular (CV) events. The level of CV risk depends on the type and duration of diabetes, age and additional co-morbidities. Diabetes is an independent risk factor for atrial fibrillation (AF) and is frequently observed in patients with AF, which further increases their risk of stroke associated with this cardiac arrhythmia. Nearly one third of patients with diabetes globally have CV disease (CVD). Additionally, co-morbid AF and coronary artery disease are more frequently observed in patients with diabetes than the general population, further increasing the already high CV risk of these patients. To protect against thromboembolic events in patients with diabetes and AF or established CVD, guidelines recommend optimal CV risk factor control, including oral anticoagulation treatment. However, patients with diabetes exist in a prothrombotic and inflammatory state. Greater clinical benefit may therefore be seen with the use of stronger antithrombotic agents or innovative drug combinations in high-risk patients with diabetes, such as those who have concomitant AF or established CVD. In this review, we discuss CV risk management strategies in patients with diabetes and concomitant vascular disease, stroke prevention regimens in patients with diabetes and AF and how worsening renal function in these patients may complicate these approaches. Accumulating evidence from clinical trials and real-world evidence show a benefit to the administration of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in patients with diabetes and AF.

Current gaps in management and timely referral of cardiorenal complications among people with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Middle East and African countries: Expert recommendations.

The upsurge of type 2 diabetes mellitus is a major public health concern in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) and Africa (AFR) region, with cardiorenal complications (CRCs) being the predominant cause of premature morbidity and mortality. High prevalence of cardiometabolic risk factors, lack of awareness among patients and physicians, deficient infrastructure, and economic constraints lead to a cascade of CRCs at a significantly earlier age in MENA and AFR. In this review, we present consensus recommendations by experts in MENA and AFR, highlighting region-specific challenges and potential solutions for management of CRCs. Health professionals who understand sociocultural barriers can significantly increase patient awareness and encourage health-seeking behavior through simple educational tools. Increasing physician knowledge on early identification of CRCs and personalized treatment based on risk stratification, alongside optimum glycemic control, can mitigate therapeutic inertia. Early diagnosis of high-risk people with regular and systematic monitoring of cardiorenal parameters, development of region-specific care pathways for timely referral to specialists, followed by guideline-recommended care with novel antidiabetics are imperative. Adherence to guideline-recommended care can catalyze utilization of sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists with demonstrated cardiorenal benefits-thus paving the way for overcoming care gaps in a cost-effective manner. Leveraging digital technology like electronic medical records can help generate real-world data and provide insights on voids in adoption of newer antidiabetic medications. A patient-centric approach, collaborative care among physicians from different specialties, alongside involvement of policy makers are key for improving patient outcomes and quality of care in MENA and AFR.

Consensus clinical recommendations for the management of plasma lipid disorders in the Middle East: 2021 update.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Disorders of plasma lipids remain key risk factors for the development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in the Middle East and are estimated to increase more dramatically in the next decade than in any other global region except Africa. This statement is an update to the 2016 consensus clinical recommendations for the management of plasma lipid disorders in the Middle East, following the evaluation of newer cholesterol-lowering agents in randomised controlled cardiovascular outcome trials, as well as the publication of revised international guidelines. METHODS: A multidisciplinary panel of regional experts was convened to update the consensus clinical recommendations for the management of plasma lipids in the Middle East. The recommendations constructed in 2016 were reviewed against emerging research since publication. RESULTS: Newly developed Middle East ASCVD risk categories were established using the multiple risk group categories from the recently updated international guidelines and the epidemiological evidence from the Gulf Region. These consensus recommendations support a more intensive reduction of LDL-C across cardiovascular risk categories. Alongside low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, we recommend non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol as a primary treatment target. Lifestyle modifications remain the first-line treatment recommendation for all patients. The first-line pharmacological treatment in patients with dyslipidaemia is statin therapy, with a number of second-line agents available. The selection of a second lipid-lowering agent for combination therapy with statin should be based on the lipid-lowering target of the patient. Guidance is also provided on the management of underlying conditions and special populations; of particular pertinence in the region are familial hypercholesterolaemia, diabetes and metabolic dyslipidaemia. New therapies have emerged from research that found positive outcomes in reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. The initial results of these newly researched drugs strongly indicate their inclusion as future therapies in dyslipidaemia management in the Middle East. CONCLUSIONS: These updated consensus clinical recommendations provide practicing clinicians with comprehensive, region-specific guidance to improve the detection and management of plasma lipid disorders in patients in the Middle East.

From Clinical Clues to Final Diagnosis: The Return of Detective Work to Clinical Medicine in Cardiac Amyloidosis.

Cardiac amyloidosis is frequently misdiagnosed, denying patients the opportunity for timely and appropriate management of the disease. The purpose of this review and case studies is to raise awareness of the diagnostic "red flags" associated with cardiac amyloidosis and the currently available non-invasive strategies for diagnosis. The review focuses on the identification of one of the two main types of cardiac amyloidosis, transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy, and non-invasive tools to distinguish this from light-chain amyloidosis. A diagnostic algorithm centered around the use of non-invasive imaging and laboratory analysis is presented. The algorithm generates four differential diagnoses for patients presenting with signs and symptoms consistent with cardiac amyloidosis. Case examples are presented, representing the four potential outcomes of diagnosis using the algorithm. The review provides a guide on how to recognize the often-overlooked presentations of this disease in clinical practice. Non-invasive imaging techniques and diagnostic tools that do not require the involvement of a specialty center have allowed for the improved diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis. Timely diagnosis of this life-threatening disease is essential for optimal management and it is imperative that clinicians have a high index of suspicion for patients presenting with "red flag" symptoms.